"The health care reform bill would have passed the House without the votes of Rep. Bart Stupak’s pro-life Democrats because House Speaker Nancy Pelosi “always carries a number of votes in her pocket,” Stupak told CNA in a Thursday phone interview.
The Michigan Democrat explained that by opting for the executive order, pro-life Democrats believe they ensured the legislation was “somewhat restrictive” towards abortion funding."
Catholic News Agancy
If, and this is a big if, Rep. Stupak is being truthful then I can understand his point. I would have voted against the bill regardless because of it's unconstitutional nature but, if what Stupak says is true, it may have made more sense to at least try to get some protections for the unborn. His actions could be viewed as a sort of strategic retreat.
Of course, all of this is based on what he now says being true. I guess the question I have regarding his actions is if this is the real reason behind them why has it taken so long to state it? The cynic in me says that he's had nearly a week to come up with a semi plausible explanation for his actions and he's trotting it out for all the world to see, hoping to hold onto power and retain his seat. But that would just be the cynic in me.
Posts
Stupak said in November 09 that he would end up voting for Obamacare, abortion or no abortion. And Stupak said that the Church (Pope & Magisterium) don't guide his decision making. Rather, his personal views and his constituency do. Stupak is full of crap. He is simply another liberal socialist democrat who has played the abortion card to make it seem as though he's pro-life, but in reality, Marxist social justice means more to him.
ReplyDeleteWhat, you don't trust a politician? If truth can't be created, I mean found, in Washington, then what are we to do?
ReplyDelete